nach oben

13.05.2024 | Original Articles

Impact of Gender-Role Attitudes and Mental Health on Hostile Sexism and Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery

verfasst von: Lu-Lin Zhang, Jin-Hua Dou, Lin Sun, Guo-Hua Lu

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Each year, tens of thousands of people worldwide choose to undergo cosmetic surgery in order to alter their appearance. In recent years, young people have gradually emerged to comprise the main driving force behind the increasing demand for cosmetic surgery. Previous studies have found that sexism may motivate young people to undergo such surgeries. However, few studies have been conducted to determine if this psychological mechanism influences the acceptance of cosmetic surgery among Chinese university students.

Methods

A total of 579 Chinese university students (280 girls and 299 boys, 17–20 years) volunteered to participate in the online survey. They completed a questionnaire containing the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, the 12-item General Health Questionnaire, the Gender-Role Attitudes Questionnaire and the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale. We firstly evaluated the underlying factor structure of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and exploring pattern of associations between the constructs was analyzed via path analysis.

Results

According to the findings, hostile sexism was associated with greater levels of acceptance toward cosmetic surgery. Moreover, gender-role attitudes mediated the link between hostile sexism and the acceptance of cosmetic surgery, and this mediation was positively influenced by general mental health.

Conclusion

Our study contributes to a deeper understanding of Chinese university students' attitudes toward cosmetic surgery, hostile sexism may contribute to normalizing traditional gender stereotypes and encourage cosmetic surgery acceptability among Chinese university students.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Wray RC (2003) Atlas of hand surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(6):1726–1727. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Prs.0000089914.16354.82CrossRef

Rohrich RJ (2003) The American society of plastic surgeons’ procedural statistics: what they really mean. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(5):1389–1392. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000084284.02024.3BCrossRefPubMed

Zuckerman D, Abraham A (2008) Teenagers and cosmetic surgery: focus on breast augmentation and liposuction. J Adolesc Health 43(4):318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.018CrossRefPubMed

Kazeminia M, Salari N, Heydari M et al (2023) The effect of cosmetic surgery on self-esteem and body image: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trial studies. Eur J Plast Surg 46:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-022-01987-6CrossRef

Cooter RD, Brightman LA, Deva A, Murphy RX et al (2023) Developing an international framework for informed consent in plastic surgery: a focus on cosmetic breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 11(11):e5371. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005371CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gilardi R, Galassi L, Del-Bene M, Firmani G, Parisi P (2023) Infective complications of cosmetic tourism: a systematic literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 84:9–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.021CrossRefPubMed

Denadai R, Chou PY, Su YY, Lo CC et al (2019) Facial appearance and psychosocial features in orthognathic surgery: a FACE-Q- and 3D facial image-based comparative study of patient-, clinician-, and lay-observer-reported outcomes. J Clin Med 8(6):909. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060909CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Van den Elzen HE, Barends AJ, Van Vugt M et al (2023) Facial aesthetic minimally invasive procedure: more than just vanity, a social-psychological approach. J Cosmet Dermatol 22(7):2063–2070. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15678CrossRefPubMed

Nerini A, Matera C, Di Gesto C, Policardo GR, Stefanile C (2019) Exploring the links between self-compassion, body dissatisfaction, and acceptance of cosmetic surgery in young Italian women. Front Psychol 10:2698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02698CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Di Gesto C, Nerini A, Policardo G, Matera C (2022) Predictors of acceptance of cosmetic surgery: instagram images-based activities, appearance comparison and body dissatisfaction among women. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(1):502–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02546-3CrossRef

11.

Lee AD, Hale EW, Mundra L et al (2023) The heart of it all: body dysmorphic disorder in cosmetic surgery. Journal Plast, Reconstr Aesthet Surg: JPRAS 87:442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.068CrossRefPubMed

12.

Jones HE, Faulkner HR, Losken A (2022) The psychological impact of aesthetic surgery: a mini-review. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 4:ojac077. https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojac077CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Skwirczynska E, Piotrowiak M, Ostrowski M et al (2022) Welfare and self-assessment in patients after aesthetic and reconstructive treatments. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Bonell S, Barlow FK, Griffiths S (2021) The cosmetic surgery paradox: Toward a contemporary understanding of cosmetic surgery popularisation and attitudes. Body Image 38:230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.04.010CrossRefPubMed

15.

Bonell S, Murphy SC, Griffiths S (2021) Under the knife: unfavorable perceptions of women who seek plastic surgery. PLoS ONE 16(9):e0257145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Sonmez M, Esiyok E (2022) The importance of media on decision to undergo cosmetic surgery operation. Aesth Plast Surg 46:3101–3107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03139-4CrossRef

17.

Bidkhori M, Yaseri M, Akbari Sari A, Majdzadeh R (2021) Relationship between socioeconomic factors and incidence of cosmetic surgery in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Public Health 50(2):360–368. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i2.5351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Li H, Xu X, Wu L, Chen X et al (2023) Recent progress and clinical applications of advanced biomaterials in cosmetic surgery. Regen Biomater 10:rbad005. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbad005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Maisel-Campbell AL, Waldman A, Dave L et al (2024) Why different types of patients seek cosmetic treatments. Arch Dermatol Res 316:84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02813-0CrossRefPubMed

20.

Miller L (2021) Deracialisation or body fashion? Cosmetic surgery and body modification in Japan. Asian Stud Rev 45(2):217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1764491CrossRef

21.

Ko SY, Wei M (2020) A culturally modified application of objectification theory to Asian and Asian-American women. Couns Psychol 48(7):1048–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000020938872CrossRef

22.

Sonmez M, Esiyok E (2023) The effect of social media usage, appearance-related social media pressure and body mass index on body appreciation of cosmetic procedure patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 47(6):2711–2718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03654-yCrossRefPubMed

23.

Hussain S, Asad S, Khalid Z et al (2023) Perceived emotional invalidation, physical appearance comparisons and attitude towards cosmetic surgery among female undergraduate university students. Curr Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05237-1CrossRef

24.

Lyu Z, Wang Y, Chen C, Zheng P (2023) Selfie behavior and cosmetic surgery consideration in adolescents: the mediating roles of physical appearance comparisons and facial appearance concern. Psychol Health Med 28(8):2273–2285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2022.2148699CrossRefPubMed

25.

Galeotti T, Marino C, Canale N et al (2023) Changing to impress: testing a mediation model from instagram self-presentation to cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03501-0CrossRef

26.

Nerini A, Matera C, Romani F et al (2022) Retouched or unaltered? That is the question. Body image and acceptance of cosmetic surgery in young female instagram users. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03225-7CrossRef

27.

Sun Q (2021) Selfie editing and consideration of cosmetic surgery among young Chinese women: the role of self-objectification and facial dissatisfaction. Sex Roles 84(11–12):670–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01191-5CrossRef

28.

Jackson AC, Dowling NA, Honigman RJ et al (2012) The experience of teasing in elective cosmetic surgery patients. Behav Med 38(4):129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2012.703976CrossRefPubMed

29.

Lee K, Guy A, Dale J, Wolke D (2017) Adolescent desire for cosmetic surgery: associations with bullying and psychological functioning. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(5):1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003252CrossRefPubMed

30.

Matera C, Nerini A, Stefanile C (2018) Why are men interested in cosmetic surgery procedures? Examining the role of different forms of peer influence, social comparison, internalization, and body dissatisfaction. Body Image 26:74–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.06.003CrossRefPubMed

31.

Atari M, Barbaro N, Sela Y, Shackelford TK, Chegeni R (2017) Consideration of cosmetic surgery as part of women’s benefit-provisioning mate retention strategy. Front Psychol 8:1389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01389CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Qiang S, Li FY, Zhou Y, Li Q, Song BQ (2023) Exploring the motivations for pursuing operative labiaplasty in Chinese patients. J Obstet Gynaecol: J Inst Obstet Gynaecol 43(1):2204963. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2023.2204963CrossRef

33.

Alghamdi HY et al (2023) The health impacts, prevalence, and acceptance level of cosmetics interventions among females in Saudi Arabia. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojad053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Maisel A, Waldman A, Furlan K, Weil A et al (2018) Self-reported patient motivations for seeking cosmetic procedures. JAMA Dermatol 154(10):1167–1174. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2357CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Swami V, Salem N, Furnham A, Tovée M (2008) Initial examination of the validity and reliability of the female photographic figure rating scale for body image assessment. Personal Individ Differ 44(8):1752–1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.002CrossRef

36.

Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA (2016) Objectification theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychol Women Q 21(2):173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.xCrossRef

37.

Huang X, Lin R, Yan Y (2024) Self-objectification and cosmetic surgery consideration among Chinese young women: the mediating roles of alienation and body image inflexibility. J Health Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053231222854CrossRefPubMed

38.

Lăzărescu GM, Vintilă M (2023) The relationship between personality traits and willingness to undergo cosmetic surgery in the non-clinical population - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol 14:1241952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241952CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Wu Y, Mulkens S, Atkinson MJ, Alleva JM (2024) A brief online cognitive dissonance-based intervention to reduce consideration of cosmetic surgery and improve body image among Chinese women. Psychol Women Q 48(1):80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231183946CrossRef

40.

Li B, Xiao L (2023) Influence of objectification belief and consumerism culture on Chinese women’s views of cosmetic surgery. Curr Psychol 42:3024–3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01654-2CrossRef

41.

Wu Y, Mulkens S, Alleva JM (2022) Body image and acceptance of cosmetic surgery in China and the Netherlands: a qualitative study on cultural differences and similarities. Body Image 40:30–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.10.007CrossRefPubMed

42.

Xiao LJ, Wang F (2021) Examining the links between beauty ideals internalization, the objectification of women, and ambivalent sexism among Chinese women: the effects of sexual orientation. Arch Sex Behav 50(2):553–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01718-7CrossRefPubMed

43.

Nerini A, Di Gesto C, Lo Bartolo M, Innocenti A, Stefanile C, Matera C (2023) Self-awareness and social influences as predictors of body dissatisfaction and acceptance of cosmetic surgery for social reasons among men. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03565-y.Advanceonlinepublication.doi:10.1007/s00266-023-03565-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Ladd BA, Maheux AJ, Roberts SR, Choukas-Bradley S (2022) Black adolescents’ appearance concerns, depressive symptoms, and self-objectification: exploring the roles of gender and ethnic-racial identity commitment. Body Image 43:314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.09.008CrossRefPubMed

45.

Choma BL et al (2021) Self-objectification, self-esteem, and gender: testing a moderated mediation model. Sex Roles 63(9–10):645–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9829-8CrossRef

46.

Calogero RM et al (2010) Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles 63(1–2):32–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9759-5CrossRef

47.

Bordo S (2023) Unbearable weight: feminism, western culture, and the body. Univ of California Press, CaliforniaCrossRef

48.

Jeffreys S (2014) Beauty and misogyny: harmful cultural practices in the West. Routledge, LondonCrossRef

49.

Glick P, Fiske ST (1996) The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J Pers Soc Psychol 70(3):491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491CrossRef

50.

Christopher AN, Mull MS (2016) Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychol Women Q 30(2):223–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.xCrossRef

51.

Hammond MD, Milojev P, Huang Y, Sibley CG (2018) Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 9(7):863–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617727588CrossRef

52.

Swami V, Coles R, Wyrozumska K, Wilson E, Salem N, Furnham A (2010) Oppressive beliefs at play: associations among beauty ideals and practices and individual differences in sexism, objectification of others, and media exposure. Psychol Women Q 34(3):365–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01582.xCrossRef

53.

Bernard P, Laet MD, Gervais SJ (2021) Is body inversion effect a valid measure of women’s objectification? Yes, it is! Personal Individ Differ 175:110708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110708CrossRef

54.

Harsey SJ, Zurbriggen EL (2021) Men and women’s self-objectification, objectification of women, and sexist beliefs. Self Identity 20(7):861–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1784263CrossRef

55.

Sherman AM, Tran S, Sy J (2023) Objectification and body esteem: age group patterns in women’s psychological functioning. Aging Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2023.2273338CrossRefPubMed

56.

Szymanski DM, Strauss Swanson C, Carretta RF (2021) Interpersonal sexual objectification, fear of rape, and U.S. college women’s depression. Sex Roles 84:720–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01194-2CrossRef

57.

Wollast R, De Wilde M, Bernard P, Klein O (2020) Perceiving one’s body through the eyes of others: a review of literature on self-objectification. L’Année psychologique 120:321–347. https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy1.203.0321CrossRef

58.

Lin X, Gao H, Wang R, Wu Y (2023) Life history strategies, body surveillance, and online interpersonal sexual objectification experiences on women’s body shame. Personal Individ Differ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111950CrossRef

59.

Hong D, Tang C, Barnhart WR, Cui S, He J (2023) Testing the associations between internalized cisgenderism, self-objectification, body shame, and mental health correlates in the framework of the pantheoretical model of dehumanization: a study in Chinese transgender adults. Body Image 46:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.05.003CrossRefPubMed

60.

Sánchez-Fuentes MDM, Moyano N, Parra-Barrera SM, Granados de Haro R (2023) Objectification and violence against women: the Spanish validation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale-perpetration version. Violence Against Women. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231203623CrossRefPubMed

61.

Moya-Garófano A, Rodríguez-Bailón R, Moya M, Megías JL (2021) Stranger harassment (“Piropo”) and women’s self-objectification: the role of anger, happiness, and empowerment. J Interpers Violence 36(5–6):2306–2326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760258CrossRefPubMed

62.

Beck V, Rose C (2021) Is sexual objectification and victimization of females in video games associated with victim blaming or victim empathy? J Interpers Violence 36(5–6):NP3196–NP3221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518770187CrossRefPubMed

63.

Barnes M, Abhyankar P, Dimova E, Best C (2020) Associations between body dissatisfaction and self-reported anxiety and depression in otherwise healthy men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 15(2):e0229268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229268CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Swami V, Voracek M (2013) Associations among men’s sexist attitudes, objectification of women, and their own drive for muscularity. Psychol Men Masculin 14(2):168–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028437CrossRef

65.

Blond A (2008) Impacts of exposure to images of ideal bodies on male body dissatisfaction: a review. Body Image 5(3):244–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.02.00324CrossRefPubMed

66.

Galioto R, Crowther JH (2013) The effects of exposure to slender and muscular images on male body dissatisfaction. Body Image 10(4):566–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.009CrossRefPubMed

67.

Schaefer LM, Rodgers RF, Thompson JK, Griffiths S (2021) A test of the tripartite influence model of disordered eating among men. Body Image 36:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.009CrossRefPubMed

68.

Yeung NC, Massar K, Jonas KJ (2021) “Who pushes you to be bigger?”: psychosocial correlates of muscle dissatisfaction among Chinese male college students in Hong Kong. Psychol Men Masculin 22(1):177–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000283CrossRef

69.

Forbes GB et al (2004) Association of the thin body ideal, ambivalent sexism, and self-esteem with body acceptance and the preferred body size of college women in Poland and the United States. Sex Roles 50(5/6):331–345. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Sers.0000018889.14714.20CrossRef

70.

Swami V (2010) Translation and validation of the Malay acceptance of cosmetic surgery scale. Body Image 7(4):372–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.07.005CrossRefPubMed

71.

Eriksen S, Goering S (2011) A test of the agency hypothesis in women’s cosmetic surgery usage. Sex Roles 64(11–12):888–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9952-1CrossRef

72.

Eisler RM, Skidmore JR, Ward CH (1988) Masculine gender-role stress: predictor of anger, anxiety, and health-risk behaviors. J Pers Assess 52(1):133–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_12CrossRefPubMed

73.

Abbas OL, Karadavut U (2017) Analysis of the factors affecting men’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery: body image, media exposure, social network use, masculine gender role stress and religious attitudes. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(6):1454–1462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0882-3CrossRef

74.

Kowal M et al (2023) Predictors of enhancing human physical attractiveness: data from 93 countries. Evol Hum Behav 43(6):455–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.08.003CrossRef

75.

Hunt CJ, Gonsalkorale K, Murray SB (2013) Threatened masculinity and muscularity: an experimental examination of multiple aspects of muscularity in men. Body Image 10(3):290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.02.007CrossRefPubMed

76.

Khattab NR, Abdelraouf N, Ashour T (2022) Conflicting cultural and religious views on cosmesis: the modern women’s dilemma. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(4):2040–2052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02834-6CrossRef

77.

Jackson T, Chen H (2015) Features of objectified body consciousness and sociocultural perspectives as risk factors for disordered eating among late-adolescent women and men. J Couns Psychol 62(4):741–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000096CrossRefPubMed

78.

Masser BM, Abrams D (2004) Reinforcing the glass ceiling: the consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles 51(9–10):609–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-5470-8CrossRef

79.

Midgette AJ, Liu J, Onyishi IE (2023) Beyond equality: a cross-cultural investigation of young straight adults’ expectations for future family labor. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01415-4CrossRef

80.

Puwar N (2016) Thinking about making a difference. British J Politics Int Relat 6(1):65–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00127.xCrossRef

81.

Grossbart TA, Sarwer DB (2003) Psychosocial issues and their relevance to the cosmetic surgery patient. Semin Cutan Med Surg 22(2):136–147. https://doi.org/10.1053/sder.2003.50013CrossRefPubMed

82.

Nakamura Y, Mulliken JB, Belfer ML (2004) Cross-cultural understanding of aesthetic surgery: the male cosmetic surgery patient in japan and the USA. Aesthet Plast Surg 4(4):283–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002660010047CrossRef

83.

Wright MR, Wright WK (1975) A psychological study of patients undergoing cosmetic surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 101(3):145–151. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1975.00780320003001CrossRefPubMed

84.

O’Neil JM (2012) Patterns of gender role conflict and strain: sexism and fear of femininity in men’s lives. Pers Guid J. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1981.tb00282.xCrossRef

85.

Qin L, Xu K et al (2015) The effect of parenting styles on male adolescents’ psychological sub-health: the mediating effect of gender role conflict. Chin J Spec Educ 10:92–96. (In Chinese)

86.

Baird S et al (2019) Do restrictive gender attitudes and norms influence physical and mental health during very young adoslescence? Evidence from Bangladesh and Ethiopia. SSM Popul Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

87.

Chen Z, Fiske ST, Lee TL (2009) Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles 60(11–12):765–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9585-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

88.

Tie L, Zheng Y (2023) Judgments and attributions of intimate partner violence in China: the role of directionality, gender stereotypicality, and ambivalent sexism. J Interpers Violence 38(19–20):10485–10513. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231172477CrossRefPubMed

89.

Henderson-King D, Henderson-King E (2005) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: scale development and validation. Body Image 2(2):137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.003CrossRefPubMed

90.

Lazarescu G, Maïano C, Vintilă M, Goian C, Swami V (2023) Psychometric properties of a Romanian translation of the acceptance of cosmetic surgery scale (ACSS): an examination using bifactor exploratory structural equation modelling. Body Image 45:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.03.011CrossRefPubMed

91.

Wu Y, Alleva JM, Mulkens S (2020) Factor analysis and psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the acceptance of cosmetic surgery scale. Body Image 33:244–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.03.009CrossRefPubMed

92.

Goldberg DP, Williams P (1988) A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire.

93.

Nouri F, Feizi A, Roohafza H, Sadeghi M, Sarrafzadegan N (2021) How different domains of quality of life are associated with latent dimensions of mental health measured by GHQ-12. Health Qual Life Outcomes 19(1):255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01892-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

94.

Lewis CA, Chuykova T, Malik JA (2020) Examining the factor structure of the Russian translation of the general health questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) among a sample of Russian university students. Eur Psychiatr. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.6CrossRef

95.

Liu Z, Xi C, Zhong M et al (2023) Factorial validity of the 12-item general health questionnaire in patients with psychological disorders. Curr Psychol 42:18133–18141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02845-1CrossRef

96.

Ip WY, Martin CR (2006) Psychometric properties of the 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Chinese women during pregnancy and in the postnatal period. Psychol Health Med 11(1):60–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500500155750CrossRefPubMed

97.

Shi (2006) A study of the relationship between university students’ attitude of gender role and achievement motivation. Soochow University [In Chinese]

98.

Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S (2003) Scaling procedures: issues and applications. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17344CrossRef

99.

Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1(2):245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10CrossRef

100.

Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (2016) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408CrossRef

101.

Chennamaneni PR et al (2016) Diagnosing harmful collinearity in moderated regressions: a roadmap. Int J Res Mark 33(1):172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.08.004CrossRef

102.

Bartlett MS (2018) A note on the multiplying factors for various χ2 approximations. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol) 16(2):296–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00174.xCrossRef

103.

Wollast R et al (2020) Percevoir son corps à travers le regard d’autrui: une revue de la littérature sur l’auto-objectification. L’Année psychologique 120(3):321–347. https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy1.203.0321CrossRef

104.

Wang W et al (2021) The role of beauty as currency belief in acceptance of cosmetic surgery and career aspirations among Chinese young women. J Soc Psychol 161(3):351–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2020.1842314CrossRefPubMed

105.

Carretta RF, Szymanski DM (2022) Self-objectification and alcohol use in young adult college women. Sex Roles 86(11–12):667–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01295-0CrossRef

106.

Plieger T et al (2021) The association between sexism, self-sexualization, and the evaluation of sexy photos on instagram. Front Psychol 12:716–417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716417CrossRef

107.

Guo Q, Wang Y, Wu M (2022) The relationship between different types of objectification, sexual pressure, and relationship satisfaction in Chinese heterosexual dating relationships. J Soc Pers Relat 39(2):245–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211035183CrossRef

108.

GuizzoF CM (2020) Women, not objects: testing a sensitizing web campaign against female sexual objectification to temper sexual harassment and hostile sexism. Media Psychol 24(4):509–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1756338CrossRef

109.

Forbes GB et al (2007) Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles 56(5–6):265–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9161-5CrossRef

110.

Glick P et al (2000) Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(5):763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.763CrossRefPubMed

111.

Jackman MR (1994) The velvet glove: paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Univ of California Press, CaliforniaCrossRef

112.

Eagly AH, Wood W (2012) Social role theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology. Sage Publications, California, pp 458–476CrossRef

113.

Houle J, Mishara BL, Chagnon F (2008) An empirical test of a mediation model of the impact of the traditional male gender role on suicidal behavior in men. J Affect Disord 107(1–3):37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.016CrossRefPubMed

114.

Sweeting H et al (2014) Changing gender roles and attitudes and their implications for well-being around the new millennium. Soc Psychiatr Psychiatr Epidemiol 49(5):791–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0730-yCrossRef

115.

King TL, Singh A, Milner A (2019) Associations between gender-role attitudes and mental health outcomes in a nationally representative sample of Australian adolescents. J Adolesc Health 65(1):72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.011CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Impact of Gender-Role Attitudes and Mental Health on Hostile Sexism and Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery
verfasst von: Lu-Lin Zhang
Jin-Hua Dou
Lin Sun
Guo-Hua Lu
Publikationsdatum: 13.05.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04028-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Impact of Gender-Role Attitudes and Mental Health on Hostile Sexism and Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of Evidence V

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of Evidence V

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Update Chirurgie