nach oben

15.05.2024 | Original Article

Comparison of traditional growth rods and magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched mid term follow-up study

verfasst von: Anuj Gupta, Abhishek Srivastava, Naveen Pandita, Ankur Goswami, Govindaraja Perumal Vijayaraghavan, Arvind Jayaswal

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has always been a challenging situation for spine surgeons. The aim of treatment is to control the direction of curve progression to allow for the complete development of lungs. Among all the growth constructs available, traditional growth rods (TGR) and magnetically controlled growth rods (MCGR) are most widely used. The MCGR has been introduced a few years back and there is a dearth of long-term follow-up studies. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of TGR and MCGR for the treatment of EOS.

Methods

All patients of EOS managed with either TGR or MCGR were included in the study. The patients managed with other methods or having follow-up < 2-years were excluded from the study. A total of 20 patients were recruited in the MCGR group and 28 patients were recruited in the TGR group. Both groups were matched by etiology, gender, pre-operative radiological parameters, and complications including unplanned surgeries.

Results

The mean age in our study was 7.90 years in the MCGR group and 7.46 years in the TGR group. The mean duration of follow-up in the MCGR group was 50.89 months and in the TGR group 94.2 months. Pre-operative cobb’s angle in the coronal plane and T1–S1 were comparable in both groups with a mean cobb’s angle of 65.4 in MCGR and 70.5 in TGR. The mean T1–S1 length in the MCGR group was 36.1cms and in the TGR group was 35.2 cms (p = 0.18). The average increase in T1–S1 length was 1.3 cm/year in the TGR group and 1.1 cm/year in the MCGR group (p > 0.05). The TGR patients underwent 186 open lengthening surgeries and 11 unplanned surgeries for various complications. The MCGR group has 180 non-invasive lengthening with only 4 unplanned returns to OT for various causes.

Conclusion

The curve correction was similar in both TGR and MCGR groups. The average T1–S1 length achieved on final follow-up was similar in both groups. The MCGR patients have attained similar correction with fewer invasive procedures and lesser complications compared to the TGR group.

Yang S, Andras LM, Redding GJ et al (2016) Early-onset scoliosis: a review of history, current treatment, and future directions. Pediatrics 137(1):e20150709CrossRef

Smith JR, Samdani AF, Pahys J et al (2009) The role of bracing, casting, and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib for the treatment of infantile idiopathic scoliosis: a single-institution experience with 31 consecutive patients. Clinical article J Neurosurg Spine 11(1):3–8CrossRefPubMed

Moe JH, Kharrat K, Winter RB et al (1984) Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 185:35–45CrossRef

Goldberg CJ, Gillic I, Connaughton O et al (2003) Respiratory function and cosmesis at maturity in infantile-onset scoliosis. Spine 28(20):2397–2406CrossRefPubMed

Skaggs DL, Akbarnia BA, Flynn JM et al (2014) Chest wall and spine deformity study group; growing spine study group; pediatric orthopaedic society of north america; scoliosis research society growing spine study committee. A classification of growth friendly spine implants. J Pediatr Orthop 34(3):260–274CrossRefPubMed

Varley ES, Pawelek JB, Mundis GM Jr, Oetgen ME, Sturm PF, Akbarnia BA (2021) Pediatric spine study group; Yaszay B. The role of traditional growing rods in the era of magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Spine Deform 9(5):1465–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00332-4CrossRefPubMed

Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM (2019) Magnetically controlled growing rods in early onset scoliosis. Indications, timing and treatment. Orthopäde 48:477–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-019-03755-0CrossRefPubMed

Guiroy A, Sícoli A, Masanés NG et al (2018) How to perform the Wiltse posterolateral spinal approach: technical note. Surg Neurol Int 14(9):38. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_344_17CrossRef

Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ et al (2014) Development and initial validation of the classification of early-onset scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1359e67CrossRef

10.

Klyce W, Mitchell SL, Pawelek J et al (2020) Characterizing use of growth-friendly implants for early-onset scoliosis: a 10-year update. J Pediatr Orthop 40(8):e740–e746. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001594CrossRefPubMed

11.

Cheung KM, Cheung JP, Samartzis D et al (2012) Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series. Lancet 379(9830):1967–1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60112-3CrossRefPubMed

12.

Cheung JPY, Sze KY, Cheung KMC et al (2021) The first magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in the world—lessons learned and how the identified complications helped to develop the implant in the past decade: case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):319. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04181-0.PMID:33794851;PMCID:PMC8015050CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Bouthors C, Gaume M, Glorion C et al (2019) Outcomes at skeletal maturity of 34 children with scoliosis treated with a traditional single growing rod. Spine 44(23):1630–1637. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003148CrossRefPubMed

14.

Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB, Cheung KM et al (2014) Traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched 2-year study. Spine Deform 2(6):493–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050CrossRefPubMed

15.

Helenius IJ (2020) Standard and magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis. Ann Transl Med 8(2):26. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.09.72CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Srivastava A, Pandita N, Gupta A et al (2023) Use of intra-operative internal distraction for the application of magnetically controlled growth rods (MCGR): a technique for maximizing correction in the rigid immature spine during index surgery. Spine Deform 11(1):225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00579-5CrossRefPubMed

17.

Dimeglio A, Canavese F (2012) The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J 21(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1983-3CrossRefPubMed

18.

Cengiz B, Ozdemir H, Sakaogullari A et al (2021) Traditional dual growing rod technique in the management of early onset scoliosis and its effects on spinal growth and lung development: the mid-term prospective results. Cureus 13(4):e14422. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14422CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Shah SA, Karatas AF, Dhawale AA et al (2014) The effect of serial growing rod lengthening on the sagittal profile and pelvic parameters in early-onset scoliosis. Spine 39(22):E1311-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000565CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ilharreborde B, Ponchelet L, Sales de Gauzy J et al (2022) How does magnetically controlled growing rods insertion affect sagittal alignment in ambulatory early onset scoliosis patients? Eur Spine J 31(4):1036–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07071-0CrossRefPubMed

21.

Erdoğan S, Polat B, Atıcı Y et al (2019) Comparison of the effects of magnetically controlled growing rod and tradiotinal growing rod techniques on the sagittal plane in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 62(5):577–585. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0094CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Kwan KYH, Alanay A, Yazici M et al (2017) Unplanned reoperations in magnetically controlled growing rod surgery for early onset scoliosis with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Spine 42(24):E1410–E1414. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297CrossRefPubMed

23.

Jones CS, Stokes OM, Patel SB et al (2015) Actuator pin fracture in magnetically controlled growing rods: two cases. Spine J 16(4):e287-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.12.020CrossRefPubMed

24.

Cheung JPY, Yiu KKL, Samartzis D et al (2017) Rod lengthening with the magnetically controlled growing rod: factors influencing rod slippage and reduced gains during distractions. Spine 43(7):E399–E405. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002358CrossRef

25.

Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS et al (2008) Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine 33:984–90CrossRefPubMed

26.

Gardner A, Beaven A, Marks D et al (2017) Does the law of diminishing returns apply to the lengthening of the MCGR rod in early onset scoliosis with reference to growth velocity? J Spine Surg 3(4):525–530. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.08.16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Lampe LP, Schulze Bövingloh A, Gosheger G et al (2019) Magnetically controlled growing rods in treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a single center study with a minimum of 2-year-follow up and preliminary results after converting surgery. Spine 44(17):1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003048CrossRefPubMed

28.

Obid P, Yiu K, Cheung K et al (2021) Magnetically controlled growing rods in early onset scoliosis: radiological results, outcome, and complications in a series of 22 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141(7):1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03518-zCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Comparison of traditional growth rods and magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched mid term follow-up study
verfasst von: Anuj Gupta
Abhishek Srivastava
Naveen Pandita
Ankur Goswami
Govindaraja Perumal Vijayaraghavan
Arvind Jayaswal
Publikationsdatum: 15.05.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08301-x

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Comparison of traditional growth rods and magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched mid term follow-up study

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie